Litcius/Paper detail

Australian general practitioners’ attitudes to the extraction of research data from electronic health records

Adam Hodgkins, Judy Mullan, Darren J. Mayne, Costa Steven Boyages, Andrew Bonney

2020Australian Journal of General Practice28 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: General practice electronic health records (EHRs) are a rich source of primary care data that can be used for important research. The aim of this qualitative study was to analyse the attitudes of Australian general practitioners (GPs) to the use of data extracted from primary care EHRs for clinical research. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 Australian GPs. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Two main themes emerged. The data custodian role encompassed GPs' determination to maintain privacy, their trust of organisations involved and benefits of research outcomes. The theme of protecting practice resources included concerns about unrecompensed staff time and potential risks to data and systems. DISCUSSION: This study highlights that while Australian GPs have concerns about the use of data stored on their EHRs, they also recognise the benefits of using this data for research purposes. Addressing these concerns could help to ensure that researchers have access to this valuable and rich data resource.

Topics & Concepts

Global Positioning SystemQualitative researchResource (disambiguation)Health recordsData collectionQualitative propertyData extractionTheme (computing)Primary careHealth careMedicinePublic relationsInternet privacyPsychologyNursingMEDLINEFamily medicinePolitical scienceEngineeringComputer scienceSociologyWorld Wide WebComputer networkMachine learningLawTelecommunicationsSocial scienceElectronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Australian general practitioners’ attitudes to the extraction of research data from electronic health records | Litcius