Litcius/Paper detail

Differences in NPI strategies against COVID-19

Margarete Redlin

2022Journal of Regulatory Economics17 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Non-pharmaceutical interventions are an effective strategy to prevent and control COVID-19 transmission in the community. However, the timing and stringency to which these measures have been implemented varied between countries and regions. The differences in stringency can only to a limited extent be explained by the number of infections and the prevailing vaccination strategies. Our study aims to shed more light on the lockdown strategies and to identify the determinants underlying the differences between countries on regional, economic, institutional, and political level. Based on daily panel data for 173 countries and the period from January 2020 to October 2021 we find significant regional differences in lockdown strategies. Further, more prosperous countries implemented milder restrictions but responded more quickly, while poorer countries introduced more stringent measures but had a longer response time. Finally, democratic regimes and stronger manifested institutions alleviated and slowed down the introduction of lockdown measures.

Topics & Concepts

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Psychological interventionPanel dataPublic financeDemocracyDevelopment economics2019-20 coronavirus outbreakEconomicsDeveloping countryVaccinationPublic economicsPoliticsDemographic economicsEconomic growthPolitical scienceEconometricsMedicineVirologyMacroeconomicsOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseasePsychiatryPathologyLawCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Differences in NPI strategies against COVID-19 | Litcius