Litcius/Paper detail

Posterior tibial plateau impaction fractures are not associated with increased knee instability: a quantitative pivot shift analysis

Brian Godshaw, Jonathan D. Hughes, Gian Andrea Lucidi, Joshua C. Setliff, Mikael Sansone, Jón Karlsson, Volker Musahl

2023Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy10 citationsDOI

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to evaluate posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures and how they contribute to rotatory knee laxity using quantitative pivot shift analysis. It was hypothesised that neither the presence of nor the degree of involvement of the plateau would affect rotatory knee laxity in the ACL‐deficient knee. Methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 284 patients with complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries was conducted. Posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures were identified on preoperative MRI. The patients were divided into two cohorts: “fractures” or “no fractures”. The cohort with fractures was further categorised based on fracture morphology: “extra‐articular”, “articular‐impaction”, or “displaced‐articular fragment”. All data were collected during examination under anaesthesia performed immediately prior to ACL reconstruction. This included a standard pivot shift test graded by the examiner and quantitative data including anterior tibial translation (mm) via Rolimeter, quantitative pivot shift (QPS) examination (mm) via PIVOT tablet technology, and acceleration (m/sec 2 ) during the pivot shift test via accelerometer. Quantitative examinations were compared with the contralateral knee. Results There were 112 patients with posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures (112/284, 39%). Of these, 71/112 (63%) were “extra‐articular”, 28/112 (25%) “articular‐impaction”, and 13/112 (12%) “displaced‐articular”. Regarding the two groups with or without fractures, there was no difference in subjective pivot shift (2 ± 0 vs 2 ± 0, respectively, n.s.), QPS (2.4 ± 1.6 mm vs 2.7 ± 2.2 mm, respectively, n.s.), anterior tibial translation measurements (6 ± 3 mm vs 5 ± 3 mm, respectively, n.s.), or acceleration of the knee during the pivot (1.7 ± 2.3 m/s 2 vs 1.8 ± 3.1 m/s 2 , respectively, n.s.). When the fractures were further subdivided, subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences noted in any of the measured examinations between the fracture subtypes. Conclusion This study showed that the posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures are commonly encountered in the setting of ACL tears; however, contrary to previous reports, they do not significantly increase rotatory knee laxity. This suggests that this type of concomitant injury may not need to be addressed at the time of ACL reconstruction. Level of evidence Level III.

Topics & Concepts

ImpactionMedicinePivot-shift testAnterior cruciate ligamentRadiographySurgeryOrthodonticsTibial plateau fractureFluoroscopyArticular surfaceKnee JointNuclear medicineAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionInternal fixationKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesShoulder Injury and Treatment