Horizontal and anterior chamber diameter for phakic intraocular lens sizing
Adam Oleszko, Jarosław Marek, Maria Muzyka−Woźniak
Abstract
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Proper selection of phakic intraocular lens diameter is necessary to avoid complications related with excessive vaulting after its implantation. BACKGROUND: Horizontal corneal diameter, measured as white-to-white distance, is one of the parameters used for phakic intraocular lens diameter calculation. Agreement was assessed between three parameters: white-to-white distance obtained with swept source optical coherence tomography, and white-to-white distance obtained with Scheimpflug camera and angle-to-angle parameter obtained with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. METHODS: This study included 55 eyes of 43 patients. The white-to-white distance was measured with two biometry techniques: swept source optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug camera. The angle-to-angle was measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Analysis of agreement was performed by the Bland-Altman method. For every patient, simulation of Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) sizing was performed using the Online Calculation and Ordering System with different white-to-white distance or angle-to-angle. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between swept source optical coherence tomography biometer and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (p = 0.001) and between swept source optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug camera (p < 0.001). However, there was a good correlation between swept source optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug camera (intraclass correlation co-efficient = 0.623), with a shift toward higher white-to-white distance values on swept source optical coherence tomography. A relatively high correlation intraclass correlation co-efficient (0.772) and lack of statistically significant differences (p = 0.068) between anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug camera results were observed. Simulation of phakic intraocular lens sizing showed that swept source optical coherence tomography white-to-white distance should not be used interchangeably with Scheimpflug camera white-to-white distance or angle-to-angle. CONCLUSION: White-to-white distance measured with swept source optical coherence tomography was significantly different from values obtained with other methods. Angle-to-angle may support ICL sizing, helping in verification of white-to-white distance values obtained with other devices.