Litcius/Paper detail

Unsupervised learning to characterize patients with known coronary artery disease undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging

Michelle C. Williams, Bryan Bednarski, Konrad Pieszko, Robert J.H. Miller, Jacek Kwieciński, Aakash Shanbhag, Joanna X. Liang, Cathleen Huang, Tali Sharir, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Andrew J. Einstein, Albert J. Sinusas, Edward J. Miller, Timothy M. Bateman, Mathews B. Fish, Terrence D. Ruddy, Wanda Acampa, M. Timothy Hauser, Philipp A. Kaufmann, Damini Dey, Daniel S. Berman, Piotr J. Slomka

2023European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) comprise a heterogenous population with varied clinical and imaging characteristics. Unsupervised machine learning can identify new risk phenotypes in an unbiased fashion. We use cluster analysis to risk-stratify patients with known CAD undergoing single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). METHODS: From 37,298 patients in the REFINE SPECT registry, we identified 9221 patients with known coronary artery disease. Unsupervised machine learning was performed using clinical (23), acquisition (17), and image analysis (24) parameters from 4774 patients (internal cohort) and validated with 4447 patients (external cohort). Risk stratification for all-cause mortality was compared to stress total perfusion deficit (< 5%, 5-10%, ≥10%). RESULTS: Three clusters were identified, with patients in Cluster 3 having a higher body mass index, more diabetes mellitus and hypertension, and less likely to be male, have dyslipidemia, or undergo exercise stress imaging (p < 0.001 for all). In the external cohort, during median follow-up of 2.6 [0.14, 3.3] years, all-cause mortality occurred in 312 patients (7%). Cluster analysis provided better risk stratification for all-cause mortality (Cluster 3: hazard ratio (HR) 5.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0, 8.6, p < 0.001; Cluster 2: HR 3.3, 95% CI 2.5, 4.5, p < 0.001; Cluster 1, reference) compared to stress total perfusion deficit (≥10%: HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5, 2.5 p < 0.001; < 5%: reference). CONCLUSIONS: Our unsupervised cluster analysis in patients with known CAD undergoing SPECT MPI identified three distinct phenotypic clusters and predicted all-cause mortality better than ischemia alone.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineMyocardial perfusion imagingCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineHazard ratioCardiologyCohortPopulationRadiologyConfidence intervalEnvironmental healthCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Unsupervised learning to characterize patients with known coronary artery disease undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging | Litcius