Light on perenniality: Para‐dormancy is based on ABA‐GA antagonism and endo‐dormancy on the shutdown of GA biosynthesis
Manikandan Veerabagu, Christiaan van der Schoot, Veronika Turečková, Danuše Tarkowská, Miroslav Strnad, P. Rinne
Abstract
Abstract Perennial para‐ and endo‐dormancy are seasonally separate phenomena. Whereas para‐dormancy is the suppression of axillary buds (AXBs) by a growing shoot, endo‐dormancy is the short‐day elicited arrest of terminal and AXBs. In hybrid aspen ( Populus tremul a x P. tremuloides ) compromising the apex releases para‐dormancy, whereas endo‐dormancy requires chilling. ABA and GA are implicated in both phenomena. To untangle their roles, we blocked ABA biosynthesis with fluridone (FD), which significantly reduced ABA levels, downregulated GA‐deactivation genes, upregulated the major GA3ox ‐biosynthetic genes, and initiated branching. Comprehensive GA‐metabolite analyses suggested that FD treatment shifted GA production to the non‐13‐hydroxylation pathway, enhancing GA 4 function. Applied ABA counteracted FD effects on GA metabolism and downregulated several GA 3/4 ‐inducible α‐ and γ‐clade 1,3‐β‐glucanases that hydrolyze callose at plasmodesmata (PD), thereby enhancing PD‐callose accumulation. Remarkably, ABA‐deficient plants repressed GA 4 biosynthesis and established endo‐dormancy like controls but showed increased stress sensitivity. Repression of GA 4 biosynthesis involved short‐day induced DNA methylation events within the GA3ox2 promoter. In conclusion, the results cast new light on the roles of ABA and GA in dormancy cycling. In para‐dormancy, PD‐callose turnover is antagonized by ABA, whereas in short‐day conditions, lack of GA 4 biosynthesis promotes callose deposition that is structurally persistent throughout endo‐dormancy.