Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of TEC Calculations Based on Trimble, Javad, Leica, and Septentrio GNSS Receiver Data

Vladislav Demyanov, Maria A. Sergeeva, Mark E. Fedorov, Tatiana V. Ishina, V.J. Gatica-Acevedo, Enrique Cabral‐Cano

2020Remote Sensing23 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

A Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver is, to some extent, a “black box” when its data is used for ionospheric studies. Our results based on Javad, Septentrio, Trimble, and Leica GNSS receivers have proven that the accuracy of the slant Total Electron Content (TEC) calculation can differ significantly depending on the GNSS receiver type/model, because TEC measurements depend on the carrier phase tracking technique applied in a receiver. The correlation coefficient between carrier phase noise in L1 and L2 channels is considered as a possible indicator that shows if the L1-aided tracking technique or independent tracking is applied inside a receiver. An empirical model of the TEC noise component was provided to determine the TEC noise value in different types/models of GNSS receivers.

Topics & Concepts

TECGNSS applicationsTotal electron contentRemote sensingCorrelation coefficientGlobal Positioning SystemGeodesyIonosphereComputer scienceEnvironmental sciencePhysicsGeologyTelecommunicationsGeophysicsMachine learningIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsGNSS positioning and interferenceEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Comparison of TEC Calculations Based on Trimble, Javad, Leica, and Septentrio GNSS Receiver Data | Litcius