Strong coupling from an improved <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi></mml:math> vector isovector spectral function
Diogo Boito, Maarten Golterman, Kim Maltman, Santiago Peris, Marcus Vinícius Gonzalez Rodrigues, Wilder Schaaf
Abstract
We combine ALEPH and OPAL results for the spectral distributions measured in $\ensuremath{\tau}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$, $\ensuremath{\tau}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ and $\ensuremath{\tau}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}3{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ decays with (i) recent BABAR results for the analogous $\ensuremath{\tau}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{\ensuremath{-}}{K}^{0}{\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ distribution and (ii) estimates of the contributions from other hadronic $\ensuremath{\tau}$-decay modes obtained using CVC and electroproduction data, to obtain a new and more precise nonstrange, inclusive vector, isovector spectral function. The BABAR ${K}^{\ensuremath{-}}{K}^{0}$ and CVC/electroproduction results provide us with alternate, entirely data-based input for the contributions of all exclusive modes for which ALEPH and OPAL employed Monte-Carlo-based estimates. We use the resulting spectral function to determine ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{s}({m}_{\ensuremath{\tau}})$, the strong coupling at the $\ensuremath{\tau}$ mass scale, employing finite energy sum rules. Using the fixed-order perturbation theory (FOPT) prescription, we find ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{s}({m}_{\ensuremath{\tau}})=0.3077\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0075$, which corresponds to the five-flavor result ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{s}({M}_{Z})=0.1171\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0010$ at the $Z$ mass. While we also provide an estimate using contour-improved perturbation theory (CIPT), we point out that the FOPT prescription is to be preferred for comparison with other ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{s}$ determinations employing the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ scheme, especially given the inconsistency between CIPT and the standard operator product expansion recently pointed out in the literature. Additional experimental input on the dominant $2\ensuremath{\pi}$ and $4\ensuremath{\pi}$ modes would allow for further improvements to the current analysis.