Litcius/Paper detail

Comment on “Comparing the Performance of College Chemistry Students with ChatGPT for Calculations Involving Acids and Bases”

Joshua Schrier

2024Journal of Chemical Education22 citationsDOI

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In a recent paper in this Journal ( J. Chem. Educ. 2023, 100, 3934−3944), Clark et al. evaluated the performance of the GPT-3.5 large language model (LLM) on ten undergraduate pH calculation problems. They reported that GPT-3.5 gave especially poor results for salt and titration problems, returning the correct results only 10% and 0% of the time, respectively, and that, despite a correct application of heuristics, the LLM made mathematical errors and used flawed strategies. However, these problems are partially mitigated using the more advanced GPT-4 model and entirely corrected using simple prompting and calculator tool use patterns demonstrated herein.

Topics & Concepts

HeuristicsSimple (philosophy)CalculatorComputer scienceMathematics educationChemistryCalculus (dental)MathematicsEpistemologyPhilosophyMedicineOperating systemDentistryMachine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTopic Modeling
Comment on “Comparing the Performance of College Chemistry Students with ChatGPT for Calculations Involving Acids and Bases” | Litcius