Litcius/Paper detail

Addressing food insecurity in rural primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation of barriers and facilitators

Kayla Jordanova, Arvind Suresh, Chelsey R. Canavan, Tiffany D’cruze, Alka Dev, Maureen Boardman, Meaghan A. Kennedy

2024BMC Primary Care14 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity (FI) is associated with negative health outcomes and increased healthcare utilization. Rural populations face increased rates of FI and encounter additional barriers to achieving food security. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators to screening and interventions for FI in rural primary care practices. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study using surveys and semi-structured interviews of providers and staff members from rural primary care practices in northern New England. Survey data were analyzed descriptively, and thematic analysis was used to identify salient interview themes. RESULTS: Participants from 24 rural practices completed the survey, and 13 subsequently completed an interview. Most survey respondents (54%) reported their practices systematically screen for FI and 71% reported food needs were "very important" for their patients and communities. Time and resource constraints were the most frequently cited barriers to screening for and addressing FI in practices based on survey results. Interview themes were categorized by screening and intervention procedures, community factors, patient factors, external factors, practice factors, process and implementation factors, and impact of FI screening and interventions. Time and resource constraints were a major theme in interviews, and factors attributed to rural practice settings included geographically large service areas, stigma from loss of privacy in small communities, and availability of food resources through farming. CONCLUSIONS: Rural primary care practices placed a high value on addressing food needs but faced a variety of barriers to implementing and sustaining FI screening and interventions. Strategies that utilize practice strengths and address time and resource constraints, stigma, and large service areas could promote the adoption of novel interventions to address FI.

Topics & Concepts

Psychological interventionThematic analysisNursingFood securityMedicineStigma (botany)Best practiceQualitative researchEnvironmental healthPsychologyAgricultureGeographyPolitical scienceSociologyPsychiatryLawSocial scienceArchaeologyFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsChild Nutrition and Water AccessObesity and Health Practices