Litcius/Paper detail

Physicians’ views of patient–planetary health co-benefit prescribing: a mixed methods systematic review

Nicole Redvers, Kyla Wright, Jamie Hartmann‐Boyce, Sarah Tonkin‐Crine

2023The Lancet Planetary Health20 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Health professionals are increasingly called to become partners in planetary health. Using patient-planetary health (P-PH) co-benefit prescribing framing, we did a mixed methods systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators to adopting P-PH co-benefit prescribing by physicians and mapped these onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We searched electronic databases from inception until October, 2022, and did a content analysis of the included articles (n=12). Relevant categories were matched to items in the COM-B model and TDF. Nine barriers and eight facilitators were identified. Barriers included an absence of, or little, knowledge of how to change practice and time to implement change; facilitators included having policy statements and guidelines from respected associations. More diverse study designs that include health professionals, patients, and health-care system stakeholders are needed to ensure a more holistic understanding of the individual, system, and policy levers involved in implementing clinical work informed by planetary health.

Topics & Concepts

Framing (construction)Health professionalsHealth careNursingWork (physics)PsychologyMedicineFamily medicineMedical educationPolitical scienceEngineeringStructural engineeringMechanical engineeringLawClimate Change and Health ImpactsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Physicians’ views of patient–planetary health co-benefit prescribing: a mixed methods systematic review | Litcius