Litcius/Paper detail

How Shortening or Lengthening Design Processes Configure Decision Making

Jeanette Falk, Christopher Frauenberger, Gopinaath Kannabiran

202211 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

There have been repeated calls for developing time-sensitive discourses in HCI and design research, and for re-examining engagement with power. In response, we explore the relationship between time and decision making in design processes in order to better understand how this configures power structures. We analyse two design cases: a short-term hackathon and a long-term design process. We argue that the different temporalities of design activities configure decision making — and thereby power — and that both short- and long-term design processes differ in the ways of engaging people in designing technology: Decisions on values and concepts are prioritised in long-term design processes, decisions about implementing the vision are prioritised in short-term design processes, decisions requiring negotiations with the outside world are structurally limited in short-term design processes, non-decisions in short term design processes are pragmatic and habitual in long-term design processes.

Topics & Concepts

TemporalitiesTerm (time)NegotiationComputer scienceProcess managementDesign technologyDesign strategyProcess (computing)Design processOrder (exchange)Engineering design processHuman–computer interactionKnowledge managementManagement scienceSystems engineeringEngineeringBusinessOperations managementMarketingPolitical scienceWork in processPhysicsQuantum mechanicsFinanceMechanical engineeringOperating systemLawInnovative Human-Technology InteractionOpen Source Software InnovationsBiomedical and Engineering Education
How Shortening or Lengthening Design Processes Configure Decision Making | Litcius