Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of dielectric loss in titanium nitride and aluminum superconducting resonators

A. Melville, G. Calusine, W. Woods, K. Serniak, E. Golden, B. M. Niedzielski, D. K. Kim, A. Sevi, J. L. Yoder, E. A. Dauler, W. D. Oliver

2020Applied Physics Letters63 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Lossy dielectrics are a significant source of decoherence in superconducting quantum circuits. In this report, we model and compare the dielectric loss in bulk and interfacial dielectrics in titanium nitride (TiN) and aluminum (Al) superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators. We fabricate isotropically trenched resonators to produce a series of device geometries that accentuate a specific dielectric region's contribution to the resonator quality factor. While each dielectric region contributes significantly to loss in TiN devices, the metal–air interface dominates the loss in the Al devices. Furthermore, we evaluate the quality factor of each TiN resonator geometry with and without a post-process hydrofluoric etch and find that it reduced losses from the substrate–air interface, thereby improving the quality factor.

Topics & Concepts

Materials scienceTitanium nitrideDielectricTinDielectric lossResonatorOptoelectronicsNitrideTitaniumDielectric resonatorAluminiumSuperconductivityQ factorComposite materialQuality (philosophy)Wide-bandgap semiconductorHydrofluoric acidCoplanar waveguidePermittivityTerahertz radiationWaveguideDielectric resonator antennaTitanium alloyCondensed matter physicsElectronic engineeringDielectric strengthAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesPhotonic and Optical Devices