Preoperative Midstream Urine Cultures <i>vs</i> Renal Pelvic Urine Culture or Stone Culture in Predicting Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Urosepsis After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Minghui Liu, Jinbo Chen, Meng Gao, Huimin Zeng, Yu Cui, Zewu Zhu, Hequn Chen
Abstract
Purpose: To compare preoperative midstream urine cultures (PMUC) and renal pelvic urine culture (RPUC) or stone culture (SC) in predicting systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases up to September 1, 2020, for relevant published studies. Two authors independently confirmed whether the literatures met the inclusion criteria and collected the data from the selected literatures. A meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager Software 5.4.1. A total of 14 studies with 3540 patients were selected and analyzed in the meta-analysis. Results: Pooled data showed that SC was associated with a higher sensitivity (odds ratios [OR] 2.36, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.31–4.25; p < 0.00001), positive predictive value (PPV) (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.18–2.01; p = 0.16) and negative predictive values (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01–1.37; p = 0.06) in the diagnosis of SIRS and urosepsis after PCNL, and RPUC provided a significantly higher specificity (OR 2.70, 95% CI 2.16–3.38; p = 0.07) and PPV (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.49–3.15; p = 0.48) than PMUC in the diagnosis of SIRS and urosepsis after PCNL. Conclusion: Intraoperative SC and RPUC are more reliable than PMUC in predicting postoperative SIRS and urosepsis, identifying causative organisms, and directing antibiotic therapy for patients who underwent PCNL. PMUC, SC, and RPUC should be routinely collected for the diagnosis and management of SIRS and urosepsis after PCNL.