Litcius/Paper detail

Comparative analysis of Illumina Mouse Methylation BeadChip and reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing for routine DNA methylation analysis

Lochlan Fennell, Günter Härtel, Diane McKeone, Catherine Bond, Alexandra Kane, Barbara Leggett, Ann‐Marie Patch, Vicki Whitehall

2022Cell Reports Methods10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Researching the murine epigenome in disease models has been hampered by the lack of appropriate and cost-effective DNA methylation arrays. Here we perform a comprehensive, comparative analysis between the Mouse Methylation BeadChip (MMB) and reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) in two murine models of colorectal carcinogenesis. We evaluate the coverage, variability, and ability to identify differential DNA methylation of RRBS and MMB. We show that MMB is an effective tool for profiling the murine methylome that performs comparably with RRBS, identifying similar differentially methylated pathways. Although choice of technology is experiment dependent and will be predicated on the underlying biology being probed, these analyses provide insights into the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

Topics & Concepts

DNA methylationBisulfite sequencingEpigeneticsMethylationComputational biologyIllumina Methylation AssayBiologyEpigenomeBisulfiteMethylated DNA immunoprecipitationGeneticsDNAGeneGene expressionEpigenetics and DNA MethylationCancer-related gene regulationRNA modifications and cancer
Comparative analysis of Illumina Mouse Methylation BeadChip and reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing for routine DNA methylation analysis | Litcius