Litcius/Paper detail

Effect of iron acceptor doping and calcium donor doping in potassium sodium niobate‐based lead‐free piezoceramics

Maryam Azadeh, Changhao Zhao, Apoorva Pawadi, Shuang Gao, Till Frömling

2024Journal of the American Ceramic Society12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Lead‐free potassium sodium niobate (KNN) ferroelectrics have emerged as promising alternatives to lead‐based materials due to their reduced toxicity and sometimes enhanced properties. The opportunity to modify the ferroelectric properties by doping, nevertheless, differs from lead‐based ceramics. A much lower impact with increasing dopant concentration was observed. This study systematically investigates the differences in defect chemistry of Na 0.475 K 0.475 Li 0.065 Nb 0.92 Ta 0.08 O 3 ceramics through iron (Fe) acceptor doping and calcium (Ca) donor doping at varying concentrations. From the defect chemical point of view, it becomes evident that the impact of intrinsic defects on the electrical properties exceeds the effect of extrinsic defects induced by doping. The performance of the donor‐doped (Ca 2+ ) ceramics closely resembles that of undoped KNN. Thus, hardly any change in ferroelectric properties and conductivity is observed. For the Fe‐doped samples, the conductivity and its contribution to the dielectric loss increased, which is not to the benefit of an application as a ferroelectric. Therefore, the concepts of “softening” and “hardening” of ferroelectric properties by doping are incompatible with regularly sintered KNN ceramics.

Topics & Concepts

DopingPotassiumCalciumPotassium niobateAcceptorMaterials scienceSodiumMineralogyChemistryInorganic chemistryOptoelectronicsMetallurgyFerroelectricityDielectricCondensed matter physicsPhysicsFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Effect of iron acceptor doping and calcium donor doping in potassium sodium niobate‐based lead‐free piezoceramics | Litcius