Litcius/Paper detail

First-Principles Evaluation of fcc Ruthenium for its use in Advanced Interconnects

Timothy M. Philip, Nicholas A. Lanzillo, Tue Gunst, Troels Markussen, Jonathan Cobb, Shela Aboud, Robert R. Robison

2020Physical Review Applied25 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

As the semiconductor industry turns to alternative conductors to replace $\mathrm{Cu}$ for future interconnect nodes, much attention has been focused on evaluating the electrical performance of $\mathrm{Ru}$. The typical hcp phase has been extensively studied, but relatively little attention has been paid to the fcc phase, which has been shown to nucleate in confined structures and may be present in tight-pitch interconnects. Using ab initio techniques, we benchmark the performance of fcc $\mathrm{Ru}$. We find that the phonon-limited bulk resistivity of the fcc $\mathrm{Ru}$ is less than half of that of hcp $\mathrm{Ru}$, a feature we trace back to the stronger electron-phonon coupling elements in hcp $\mathrm{Ru}$ that are geometrically inherited from the modified Fermi-surface shape of the fcc crystal. Despite this benefit of the fcc phase, high grain-boundary scattering results in increased resistivity compared to $\mathrm{Cu}$-based interconnects with similar average grain size. We find, however, that the line resistance of fcc $\mathrm{Ru}$ is lower than that of $\mathrm{Cu}$ below 21-nm linewidth due to the conductor volume lost to adhesion and wetting liners. In addition to studying bulk transport properties, we evaluate the performance of adhesion liners for fcc $\mathrm{Ru}$. We find that it is energetically more favorable for fcc $\mathrm{Ru}$ to bind directly to silicon dioxide than through conventional adhesion liners such as $\mathrm{Ta}\mathrm{N}$ and $\mathrm{Ti}\mathrm{N}$. In the case that a thin liner is necessary for the $\mathrm{Ru}$ deposition technique, we find that the vertical resistance penalty of a liner for fcc $\mathrm{Ru}$ can be up to eight times lower than that calculated for conventional liners used for $\mathrm{Cu}$ interconnects. Our calculations, therefore, suggest that the formation of the fcc phase of $\mathrm{Ru}$ may be beneficial for advanced, low-resistance interconnects.

Topics & Concepts

Materials scienceElectrical resistivity and conductivityCondensed matter physicsNanopillarElectrical conductorScatteringSemiconductorLaser linewidthSiliconConductorInterconnectionComposite materialPhase (matter)AdhesionOptoelectronicsSheet resistanceCoupling (piping)Engineering physicsMicroelectronicsDeposition (geology)GranularityGrain boundaryElectrical resistance and conductanceImpuritySTRIPSNucleationWaferNanotechnologyPorous mediumCopper Interconnects and ReliabilityElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesElectrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
First-Principles Evaluation of fcc Ruthenium for its use in Advanced Interconnects | Litcius