Clinician Education and Adoption of Preventive Measures for COVID-19: A Survey of a Convenience Sample of General Practitioners in Lombardy, Italy

Abstract

Letters15 April 2020Clinician Education and Adoption of Preventive Measures for COVID-19: A Survey of a Convenience Sample of General Practitioners in Lombardy, ItalyFREEGionata Fiorino, MD, PhD*, Matteo Colombo, MD*, Carmela Natale, BSc, Elena Azzolini, MD, PhD, Michele Lagioia, MD, and Silvio Danese, MD, PhDGionata Fiorino, MD, PhD*Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, and Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy (G.F.)Search for more papers by this author, Matteo Colombo, MD*Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (M.C.)Search for more papers by this author, Carmela Natale, BScHumanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy (C.N., E.A., M.L.)Search for more papers by this author, Elena Azzolini, MD, PhDHumanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy (C.N., E.A., M.L.)Search for more papers by this author, Michele Lagioia, MDHumanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy (C.N., E.A., M.L.)Search for more papers by this author, and Silvio Danese, MD, PhDHumanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (S.D.)Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/M20-1447 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is overwhelming health care systems worldwide, and Italy is the most affected country in Europe with more than 135 000 cases as of 8 April 2020 (1). Among these case patients are more than 6000 health care professionals, and 94 physicians have died (2). Lombardy is the most severely hit region in terms of hospital overcrowding, and its health care professionals face key challenges (2). As the frontline first contact for patients with suspected infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), general practitioners (GPs) are frequently exposed to the virus and can become the source of community spread if not adequately protected. In Lombardy, more than 20 GPs have died of COVID-19 (3).Objective: To assess challenges faced by GPs in the prevention and management of COVID-19.Methods and Findings: We approached a convenience sample of 450 GPs affiliated with our hospital (out of a total of 604 GPs in Lombardy) to examine the prevalence of COVID-19–like symptoms, strategies adopted to prevent the spread of infection, and education on COVID-19. Of these 450 GPs, 272 (60.4%) (Table) responded; in aggregate, these 272 GPs provide care to approximately 400 000 patients. During January to March 2020, a total of 108 respondents (39.7%) had symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 (fever, cough, shortness of breath, or diarrhea or vomiting). Specifically, 54 of 108 (50.0%) had respiratory symptoms, 54 (50.0%) gastrointestinal symptoms, and 31 (28.7%) both respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms; 77.8% of those with gastrointestinal symptoms had short-term diarrhea (≤3 days), and approximately half of those with respiratory symptoms had symptoms lasting 7 days or longer. Only 18 of all 272 GPs surveyed (6.6%) had at least 1 pharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 testing, 50.0% of them because of symptoms (8.3% of all 108 symptomatic GPs). Only 2 swabs were positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1 in a GP with respiratory symptoms and 1 in a GP with only diarrhea. One hundred twenty-five GPs (46.0%) had at least 1 contact with a patient positive for SARS-CoV-2, and 76.0% of the patients they referred to the hospital with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 were positive for SARS-CoV-2.Table. Survey Results Among 272 Respondents*Two hundred thirty-eight GPs (87.5%) modified their practice of delivering care, 73.1% via telephone calls, 24.4% using telemedicine, and 2.1% using other approaches. Most GPs surveyed (264 of 272 [97.1%]) adopted strategies to avoid overcrowding of patients at their office. Among all respondents, only 46% reported that their local health department supplied them with personal protective equipment (PPE); of these, 92.0% received gloves, 94.4% surgical masks, 16.0% FFP2 or FFP3 masks, and 33.6% sanitizing gels. Most respondents (84.6%) had to purchase PPE themselves, and only 18.4% could provide PPE to patients in their waiting rooms.Only 85 GPs (31.3%) received specific training on COVID-19 management, of which 67.1% was via online sources and 32.9% by attending courses and meetings. Stratified by month, 3.5% of these GPs received the training in January, 44.7% in February, and 51.8% in March. The remaining 187 GPs self-prepared, 48.7% by reading medical journals, 28.9% through online courses, 11.8% by receiving leaflets and newsletters from the institutions (Ministry of Health or local health departments), and 10.6% by mass media.Finally, 30.0% of all respondents stated that supplied PPE was insufficient, 12.0% that the received training was insufficient, 7.0% that diagnostic tests should be more accessible, and 18.0% that dialogue and coordination with health departments and institutions should be improved.Discussion: This survey highlights some crucial challenges faced by GPs in a region with one of the largest populations affected by the COVID-19 outbreak. Frequently in close contact with COVID-19 patients, GPs are likely at high risk for contracting and spreading the infection. One in 5 GPs in our study had suggestive symptoms, but few were tested and only 2 were isolated because of positive results. Although respondents were highly exposed and perceived PPE as a key need, fewer than half received PPE from the local health department (also their employer), the institution typically charged with providing essential equipment to GPs. Specific education on prevention and management of COVID-19 was also perceived as an important unmet need: More than two thirds of GPs had to self-educate because of lack of training from public institutions (Ministry of Health or local health department).A recent viewpoint from the United Kingdom (4) highlighted 3 primary challenges GPs face: the need to provide continuous care to patients, the need to be protected by adequate preventive measures and PPE, and the need for clear guidance from public health agencies. Another survey among primary care professionals in the United States reported that 90% had to change their usual patient management by using telemedicine beginning in week 2 of the U.S. outbreak.Our study presents data after at least 4 weeks from the beginning of the pandemic in Italy and provides early insight into the urgent need to test and isolate at least symptomatic GPs to prevent community spread, provide necessary and adequate PPE to all GPs to protect them from COVID-19 during their daily work, and educate GPs and provide clear guidance on how to manage patients during the COVID-19 outbreak.References1. Dipartimento della Protezione Civile. COVID-19 Italia: monitoraggio della situazione. 2020. Accessed at http://opendatadpc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/b0c68bce2cce478eaac82fe38d4138b1 on 10 April 2020. Google Scholar2. Nacoti M, Ciocca A, Giupponi A, et al. At the epicenter of the Covid-19 pandemic and humanitarian crises in Italy: changing perspectives on preparation and mitigation. NEJM Catal. 2020;1. doi:10.1056/CAT.20.0080 CrossrefGoogle Scholar3. Federazione Nazionale degli Ordini dei Medici Chirurghi e degli Odontoiatri (FNOMCeO). Elenco dei medici caduti nel corso dell'epidemia di Covid-19. 2020. Accessed at https://portale.fnomceo.it/elenco-dei-medici-caduti-nel-corso-dellepidemia-di-covid-19 on 10 April 2020. Google Scholar4. Thornton J. Covid-19: how coronavirus will change the face of general practice forever. BMJ. 2020;368:m1279. [PMID: 32229477] doi:10.1136/bmj.m1279 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Comments 0 Comments Sign In to Submit A Comment Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Gionata Fiorino, MD, PhD; Matteo Colombo, MD; Carmela Natale, BSc; Elena Azzolini, MD, PhD; Michele Lagioia, MD; Silvio Danese, MD, PhDAffiliations: Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, and Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy (G.F.)Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (M.C.)Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy (C.N., E.A., M.L.)Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Milan, Italy (S.D.)Acknowledgment: The authors thank all of the GPs who participated in this survey.Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M20-1447.Reproducible Research Statement: Study protocol and data set: Available from Prof. Danese (e-mail, [email protected]). Statistical code: Not available.Corresponding Author: Silvio Danese, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; e-mail, [email protected]: This article was corrected on 4 June 2020 to revise Dr. Fiorino's affiliation.This article was published at Annals.org on 15 April 2020.* Drs. Fiorino and Colombo contributed equally to this work. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byThe effects of primary care monitoring strategies on COVID-19 related hospitalisation and mortality: a retrospective electronic medical records review in a northern Italian province, the MAGMA studyFamily physicians’ responses to personal protective equipment shortages in four regions in Canada: a qualitative studyQualitative exploration of perspectives of the pharmacists working in public-sector hospitals during COVID-19 pandemicImpact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inflammatory bowel disease care in Taiwan: A multicenter studyHerausforderung der COVID-19-Pandemie für die hausärztliche VersorgungLa perception du risque et l’évaluation de la confiance dans les mesures barrière des professionnels de santéMeasuring the impact of a COVID-19 continuing education programReorganisation of GP surgeries during the COVID-19 outbreak: analysis of guidelines from 15 countriesThe psychological impact of COVID-19 among primary care physicians in the province of Verona, Italy: a cross-sectional study during the first pandemic waveStockpiled personal protective equipment and knowledge of pandemic plans as predictors of perceived pandemic preparedness among German general practitionersGeneral practitioners’ knowledge, preparedness, and experiences of managing COVID-19 in AustraliaThe psychological impact of COVID-19 on general practitioners in Piedmont, ItalyInnovative COVID-19 Programs to Rapidly Serve New MexicoImpact of Sudden Global Events on Cross-Field Research CooperationProcesses for Trauma Care at Six Level I Trauma Centers During the COVID-19 PandemicOutpatient Management of Oligosymptomatic Patients with respiratory infection in the era of SARS-CoV-2: Experience from rural German general practitionersFrom Resilience to Burnout: Psychological Features of Italian General Practitioners During COVID-19 EmergencyImproving the care of older patients during the COVID-19 pandemicSARS‐CoV‐2 outbreak and lockdown in a Northern Italy hospital. Comparison with Scandinavian no‐lockdown countryIncreased Risk of COVID-19-Related Deaths among General Practitioners in Italy 1 September 2020Volume 173, Issue 5 Page: 405-407 Keywords COVID-19 Diarrhea Disclosure Health care Personal protective equipment Population statistics Prevention, policy, and public health Telemedicine Upper respiratory tract infections Vomiting ePublished: 15 April 2020 Issue Published: 1 September 2020 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2020 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Topics & Concepts