Heterotrophic Respiration and the Divergence of Productivity and Carbon Sequestration
Asko Noormets, Rosvel Bracho, Eric J. Ward, John R. Seiler, Brian D. Strahm, Wen Lin, Kristin McElligott, Jean‐Christophe Domec, Carlos A. González-Benecke, Eric J. Jokela, Daniel Markewitz, Cassandra Meek, Guofang Miao, Steven G. McNulty, John S. King, Lisa J. Samuelson, Ge Sun, Robert O. Teskey, Jason G. Vogel, Rodney E. Will, Jinyan Yang, Timothy A. Martin
Abstract
Abstract Net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem production (NEP) are often used interchangeably, as their difference, heterotrophic respiration (soil heterotrophic CO 2 efflux, R SH = NPP−NEP), is assumed a near‐fixed fraction of NPP. Here, we show, using a range‐wide replicated experimental study in loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda ) plantations that R SH responds differently than NPP to fertilization and drought treatments, leading to the divergent responses of NPP and NEP. Across the natural range of the species, the moderate responses of NPP (+11%) and R SH (−7%) to fertilization combined such that NEP increased nearly threefold in ambient control and 43% under drought treatment. A 13% decline in R SH under drought led to a 26% increase in NEP while NPP was unaltered. Such drought benefit for carbon sequestration was nearly twofold in control, but disappeared under fertilization. Carbon sequestration efficiency, NEP:NPP, varied twofold among sites, and increased up to threefold under both drought and fertilization.