Litcius/Paper detail

Replies to Contesi, Hardcastle, Pismenny, and Gallegos

Andreas Elpidorou

2022Journal of Philosophy of Emotion17 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The commentaries by Contesi, Hardcastle, Pismenny, and Gallegos pose pressing questions about the nature of boredom, frustration, and anticipation. Although their questions concern specific claims that I make in Propelled, they are of broad philosophical interest for, ultimately, they pave the way for a better understanding of these three psychological states. In my responses to the commentators, I clarify certain claims made in Propelled; provide additional support for my understanding of frustration; articulate the relationship between effort and value; defend the claim that boredom is an emotion and discuss its formal object; and finally, consider the relationship between boredom (ordinarily understood) and deep or profound boredom. I am grateful to the commentators for engaging with Propelled.

Topics & Concepts

BoredomAnticipation (artificial intelligence)Object (grammar)FrustrationValue (mathematics)PsychologyAestheticsEpistemologyComputer sciencePhilosophySocial psychologyArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMind wandering and attentionEmotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Replies to Contesi, Hardcastle, Pismenny, and Gallegos | Litcius