Litcius/Paper detail

ARAIM Continuity and Availability Assertions, Assumptions, and Evaluation Methods

Mathieu Joerger, Yawei Zhai, Ilaria Martini, Juan Blanch, Boris Pervan

2020Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation ... International Technical Meeting/Proceedings of the ... International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation11 citationsDOI

Abstract

In this paper, we describe assumptions and assertions needed to account for continuity and availability risks in Advance Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM). We identify key differences with current RAIM-based operations, including the potential of ARAIM to not require systematic pre-flight availability screening. The assumptions and assertions provide a rationale on why fault exclusion is needed in horizontal-ARAIM (H-ARAIM), but is not needed in vertical ARAIM (V-ARAIM). We implement existing methods and design new approaches to predict continuity and availability in the presence of satellite faults and outages, and we analyze performance sensitivity to risk requirements and measurement models.

Topics & Concepts

Receiver autonomous integrity monitoringComputer scienceKey (lock)Reliability engineeringSensitivity (control systems)Risk analysis (engineering)Fault detection and isolationSatelliteComputer securityEngineeringGlobal Positioning SystemSatellite navigationArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringMedicineActuatorAerospace engineeringGNSS positioning and interferenceSatellite Communication SystemsMobile Agent-Based Network Management
ARAIM Continuity and Availability Assertions, Assumptions, and Evaluation Methods | Litcius