Litcius/Paper detail

Lightweight Visual Transformers Outperform Convolutional Neural Networks for Gram-Stained Image Classification: An Empirical Study

Kim Eun Hee, Máté E. Maros, Thomas Miethke, Maximilian Kittel, Fabian Siegel, Thomas Ganslandt

2023Biomedicines10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

We aimed to automate Gram-stain analysis to speed up the detection of bacterial strains in patients suffering from infections. We performed comparative analyses of visual transformers (VT) using various configurations including model size (small vs. large), training epochs (1 vs. 100), and quantization schemes (tensor- or channel-wise) using float32 or int8 on publicly available (DIBaS, n = 660) and locally compiled (n = 8500) datasets. Six VT models (BEiT, DeiT, MobileViT, PoolFormer, Swin and ViT) were evaluated and compared to two convolutional neural networks (CNN), ResNet and ConvNeXT. The overall overview of performances including accuracy, inference time and model size was also visualized. Frames per second (FPS) of small models consistently surpassed their large counterparts by a factor of 1-2×. DeiT small was the fastest VT in int8 configuration (6.0 FPS). In conclusion, VTs consistently outperformed CNNs for Gram-stain classification in most settings even on smaller datasets.

Topics & Concepts

Convolutional neural networkArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer sciencen-gramInferenceGramTransformerQuantization (signal processing)Computer visionLanguage modelEngineeringBiologyVoltageElectrical engineeringBacteriaGeneticsCell Image Analysis TechniquesImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Lightweight Visual Transformers Outperform Convolutional Neural Networks for Gram-Stained Image Classification: An Empirical Study | Litcius