Litcius/Paper detail

Regulatory flexibility for COVID-19 research

Holly Fernandez Lynch, Neal W. Dickert, Patricia J. Zettler, Steven Joffe, Emily A. Largent

2020Journal of Law and the Biosciences50 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Clinical research is critical to combatting COVID-19, but regulatory requirements for human subjects protection may sometimes pose a challenge in pandemic circumstances. Although regulators have offered some helpful guidance for research during the pandemic, we identify further compliance challenges regarding institutional review board (IRB) review and approval, informed consent, emergency research, and research involving incarcerated people. Our proposals for regulatory flexibility in these areas seek to satisfy the goals of protecting participants and promoting the development of high-quality evidence to improve patient care. These recommendations may have relevance beyond the COVID-19 pandemic to enhance the efficiency of research oversight and participant protection more broadly.

Topics & Concepts

Flexibility (engineering)PandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Institutional review boardRelevance (law)Human researchInformed consentSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Compliance (psychology)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakQuality (philosophy)Clinical researchPolitical scienceMedicineBusinessPublic relationsEngineering ethicsPsychologyAlternative medicineLawVirologyDiseasePathologyEngineeringPsychiatryInfectious disease (medical specialty)PhilosophyMathematicsSocial psychologyStatisticsEpistemologyOutbreakMedical Malpractice and Liability IssuesEthics in Clinical ResearchEthics in medical practice