Depolarization and repolarization dynamics after His‐bundle pacing: Comparison with right ventricular pacing and native ventricular conduction
Satoshi Yanagisawa, Yasuya Inden, Ryo Watanabe, Naoki Tsurumi, Noriyuki Suzuki, Toshifumi Nakagomi, Masafumi Shimojo, Takashi Okajima, Shuro Riku, Koichi Furui, Kazumasa Suga, Rei Shibata, Toyoaki Murohara
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current study aimed to evaluate changes in electrical depolarization and repolarization parameters after His-bundle pacing (HBP) compared with right ventricular pacing (RVP) and its association with ventricular arrhythmia (VA). METHODS: Forty-one patients (13 with HBP, 14 with RVP, and 14 controls [AAI mode]) were evaluated. After continuous pacing algorithm, QRS duration, QT interval, QTc, JT interval, T-peak to T-end (Tpe), and Tpe/QT ratio were measured on electrocardiography at baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. We investigated VA occurrence and adverse events after implantation. RESULTS: At 6 months, QRS duration was significantly shorter in the HBP (121.6 ± 15.6 ms) than in the RVP (150.1 ± 14.9 ms) group. The QT intervals were lower in the HBP (424.0 ± 40.9 ms) and control (405.9 ± 23.0 ms) groups than in the RVP (453.0 ± 40.2 ms) group. The Tpe and Tpe/QT ratios at 6 months differed significantly between the HBP and RVP groups (Tpe, 69.8 ± 19.7 ms vs 87.4 ± 11.9 ms and Tpe/QT, 0.16 ± 0.03 vs 0.19 ± 0.02, respectively). The Tpe and Tpe/QT ratios were similarly shortened in the HBP and control groups. VA occurred less frequently in the HBP (15%) and control (7.1%) groups than in the RVP (50%) group (p = 0.020). The non-RVP group showed significantly lower rates of VA and major adverse events than the RVP group. Patients with VA demonstrated significantly longer QRS duration, QT interval, Tpe, and Tpe/QT at 6 months than those without VA. CONCLUSION: HBP showed better depolarization and repolarization stability than RVP.