Litcius/Paper detail

The British Sleep Society position statement on Daylight Saving Time in the UK

Megan Crawford, Eva C. Winnebeck, Malcolm von Schantz, Maria Gardani, Michelle A. Miller, Victoria L. Revell, Alanna Hare, Caroline L. Horton, Simon Durrant, Joerg Steier

2024Journal of Sleep Research12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate in the United Kingdom and in other countries about whether twice-yearly changes into and out of Daylight Saving Time should be abolished. Opinions are divided about whether any abolition of Daylight Saving Time should result in permanent Standard Time, or year-long Daylight Saving Time. The British Sleep Society concludes from the available scientific evidence that circadian and sleep health are affected negatively by enforced changes of clock time (especially in a forward direction) and positively by the availability of natural daylight during the morning. Thus, our recommendation is that the United Kingdom should abolish the twice-yearly clock change and reinstate Standard Time throughout the year.

Topics & Concepts

DaylightMorningStandard timeSleep (system call)DemographyMedicineComputer scienceSociologyOperating systemInternal medicinePhysicsAstronomyOpticsCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
The British Sleep Society position statement on Daylight Saving Time in the UK | Litcius