COVID‐19 in pregnancy: Risk of adverse neonatal outcomes

Abstract

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major public health concern and increasing cases of infection are being reported during pregnancy. In the Journal of Medical Virology, Chen et al report clinical features and outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19 in the Maternal and Child Hospital of Hubei Province, China.1 The authors present five patients (aged 25-31) with COVID-19 at term gestation (38-41 weeks), in whom delivery was uneventful and led to favorable perinatal outcomes. We write to highlight that the small cohort in Chen et al is not representative of the overall literature to date. Moreover, whilst infection at term might be relatively inconsequential, a growing body of evidence now points towards an association between preterm maternal severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, preterm delivery and adverse neonatal outcomes, which has been under-addressed. Although none of the patients in the study by Chen et al1 delivered preterm, our review of the literature highlights several instances in which preterm delivery together with the outcomes for both mother and neonate have been documented (Table 1). For instance, Liu et al report that 6 out of 13 (46%) hospitalized pregnant patients with COVID-19 delivered preterm (between 32 and 36 weeks' gestation).4 One patient developed pneumonia and septic shock, requiring intensive care admission and emergency caesarean section, unfortunately yielding a stillbirth. In another study of 10 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 pneumonia, six were preterm and of low birth weight.3 Whilst none tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at 72 hours post-birth, all preterm neonates had a pediatric critical illness score below 90, one of whom died with four remaining hospitalized. No underlying maternal disease or neonatal infection was reported, thus preterm maternal COVID-19 may independently predict poor neonatal outcome. A case-control study recently published by Li et al9 further strengthens the evidence base for this association, highlighting a significantly increased incidence of preterm delivery in cases of COVID-19 than controls, which the authors attributed to gestational complications, such as premature rupture of membranes and placental bleeding. In Chen's et al1 cohort, all SARS-CoV-2+ women were asymptomatic before delivery, with two developing mild symptoms postpartum, and the majority delivered vaginally. The greater adoption of C-section in the studies we examined was influenced by: perceived risk of vertical transmission, the lack of available negative pressure operating rooms, deteriorating maternal symptoms, or indeed conventional obstetric indications. We also noted that severe COVID-19 associated maternal morbidity was documented in three studies, which yielded adverse neonatal outcomes as one might expect. However, interestingly the majority of women generally exhibited minor symptoms or were asymptomatic - consistent with Chen et al1 - yet even in such cases preterm birth was reported. Thus, maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection may be an independent risk factor for preterm birth, regardless of symptom severity, though the mechanism remains to be clarified. Moreover, asymptomatic infections may present a considerable challenge for managing transmission risk in obstetric units. Thus, studies evaluating whether universal testing offers cost-effective improvements in clinical outcomes would be beneficial. Whilst the neonates in Chen's et al1 cohort were healthy and of normal birthweight, the literature highlights that in preterm deliveries, adverse neonatal outcomes can be expected. In the studies examined, this most commonly manifested as pneumonia and low birth weight and was concurrent with the death of two neonates. Follow up studies would be useful to assess whether longer-term outcomes of neonates born preterm to SARS-CoV-2+ mothers differ from preterm births without an associated maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection and may also illustrate any eventual consequences of maternal COVID infection that were absent at birth. Despite acknowledging its possibility, Chen et al1 did not test for vertical transmission and we would like to emphasize that vertical transmission should not be excluded as a potential mechanism. Indeed, vertical transmission has been under-tested and sparsely reported. This may relate to the challenges of testing neonates, since only a minority are symptomatic, and both oral and nasal swab testing have low sensitivity.3, 9, 10 However, emerging evidence of a neonate with elevated IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 highlights the possibility of this phenomenon.10 It is plausible that other existing reports of neonatal early onset infection may also represent vertical transmission. Notably, Zeng et al report of a neonate infected with SARS-CoV-2 that developed severe clinical sequelae.5 Although the authors attributed this outcome to prematurity, asphyxia and sepsis, the compounding pathological contributions of the virus to prematurity, and of potential vertical transmission to adverse neonatal outcomes, require further elucidation. Recent research has revealed a high expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, ACE2, and the serine protease for virus spike protein priming, TMPRSS2, in maternal-fetal interface cells. This may represent a potential mechanism for vertical transmission that warrants further investigation.11 Overall, we thank Chen et al1 for highlighting issues surrounding maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection at term but wish to draw attention to the prevalence of preterm maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection and its association with premature neonatal delivery and adverse outcomes. This warrants that obstetric and neonatal units institute anticipatory precautions when presented with a SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnancy before term. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Topics & Concepts