Litcius/Paper detail

Key criteria for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies: Report of a WHO Working Group

Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Katherine Littler, Susan Bull, Claudia Emerson, Gagandeep Kang, Melissa C. Kapulu, Elena Rey, Carla Saénz, Seema Shah, Peter G. Smith, Ross Upshur, Charles Weijer, Michael J. Selgelid

2020Vaccine106 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

This report of the WHO Working Group for Guidance on Human Challenge Studies in COVID-19 outlines ethical standards for COVID-19 challenge studies. It includes eight Key Criteria related to scientific justification, risk-benefit assessment, consultation and engagement, co-ordination of research, site selection, participant selection, expert review, and informed consent. The document aims to provide comprehensive guidance to scientists, research ethics committees, funders, policymakers, and regulators in deliberations regarding SARS-CoV-2 challenge studies by outlining criteria that would need to be satisfied in order for such studies to be ethically acceptable.

Topics & Concepts

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Informed consentEngineering ethicsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Selection (genetic algorithm)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakEthical standardsPsychologyPolitical scienceMedical educationMedicineAlternative medicineComputer sciencePathologyEngineeringDiseaseOutbreakArtificial intelligenceInfectious disease (medical specialty)Disaster Response and ManagementViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchHealthcare cost, quality, practices