Litcius/Paper detail

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Early Diagnosis of <i>SCN1A</i> -Related Epilepsies

Andreas Brunklaus, Eduardo Pérez‐Palma, Ismael Ghanty, Xinge Ji, Eva H. Brilstra, Berten Ceulemans, Nicole Chémaly, Iris Lange, Christel Depienne, Renzo Guerrini, Davide Mei, Rikke S. Møller, Rima Nabbout, Brigid M. Regan, Amy Schneider, Ingrid E. Scheffer, An‐Sofie Schoonjans, Joseph D. Symonds, Sarah Weckhuysen, Michael W. Kattan, Sameer M. Zuberi, Dennis Lal

2022Neurology73 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

<h3>Background and Objectives</h3> Pathogenic variants in the neuronal sodium channel α1 subunit gene (<i>SCN1A</i>) are the most frequent monogenic cause of epilepsy. Phenotypes comprise a wide clinical spectrum, including severe childhood epilepsy; Dravet syndrome, characterized by drug-resistant seizures, intellectual disability, and high mortality; and the milder genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+), characterized by normal cognition. Early recognition of a child9s risk for developing Dravet syndrome vs GEFS+ is key for implementing disease-modifying therapies when available before cognitive impairment emerges. Our objective was to develop and validate a prediction model using clinical and genetic biomarkers for early diagnosis of <i>SCN1A</i>-related epilepsies. <h3>Methods</h3> We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study comprising data from patients with <i>SCN1A</i>-positive Dravet syndrome and patients with GEFS+ consecutively referred for genetic testing (March 2001–June 2020) including age at seizure onset and a newly developed <i>SCN1A</i> genetic score. A training cohort was used to develop multiple prediction models that were validated using 2 independent blinded cohorts. Primary outcome was the discriminative accuracy of the model predicting Dravet syndrome vs other GEFS+ phenotypes. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 1,018 participants were included. The frequency of Dravet syndrome was 616/743 (83%) in the training cohort, 147/203 (72%) in validation cohort 1, and 60/72 (83%) in validation cohort 2. A high <i>SCN1A</i> genetic score (133.4 [SD 78.5] vs 52.0 [SD 57.5]; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and young age at onset (6.0 [SD 3.0] vs 14.8 [SD 11.8] months; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were each associated with Dravet syndrome vs GEFS+. A combined <i>SCN1A</i> genetic score and seizure onset model separated Dravet syndrome from GEFS+ more effectively (area under the curve [AUC] 0.89 [95% CI 0.86–0.92]) and outperformed all other models (AUC 0.79–0.85; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Model performance was replicated in both validation cohorts 1 (AUC 0.94 [95% CI 0.91–0.97]) and 2 (AUC 0.92 [95% CI 0.82–1.00]). <h3>Discussion</h3> The prediction model allows objective estimation at disease onset whether a child will develop Dravet syndrome vs GEFS+, assisting clinicians with prognostic counseling and decisions on early institution of precision therapies (http://scn1a-prediction-model.broadinstitute.org/). <h3>Classification of Evidence</h3> This study provides Class II evidence that a combined <i>SCN1A</i> genetic score and seizure onset model distinguishes Dravet syndrome from other GEFS+ phenotypes.

Topics & Concepts

EpilepsyPsychologyMedicineNeuroscienceEpilepsy research and treatmentNeurological disorders and treatmentsGenomics and Rare Diseases