Intrasaccular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comprehensive Review
Miriam M. Shao, Timothy G. White, Jared B. Bassett, Ehsan Dowlati, Shyle H. Mehta, Cassidy Werner, Danielle Golub, Kevin Shah, Amir R. Dehdashti, Ina Teron, Thomas W. Link, Athos Patsalides, Henry H. Woo
Abstract
Background: The endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, such as wide-neck aneurysms (WNAs), remains a challenge. More established endovascular techniques, which include balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, and flow diversion, all have their drawbacks. Intrasaccular flow disruptor devices have emerged as a useful tool for the neurointerventionalist. Methods: Here, we discuss landmark studies and provide a comprehensive, narrative review of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB; Microvention, Alisa Viejo, CA, USA), Artisse (Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA), Contour (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), Saccular Endovascular Aneurysm Lattice Embolization System (SEAL; Galaxy Therapeutics Inc, Milpitas, CA, USA), Medina (Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA), and Trenza (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) devices. Results: Intrasaccular devices have proven to be effective in treating complex aneurysms like WNAs. Conclusions: Intrasaccular flow disruptors have emerged as a new class of effective endovascular therapy, and results of ongoing clinical studies for the newer devices (e.g., SEAL and Trenza) are much anticipated.