Aligning climate scenarios to emissions inventories shifts global benchmarks
Matthew Gidden, Thomas Gasser, Giacomo Grassi, Nicklas Forsell, Iris Janssens, William F. Lamb, Jan C. Minx, Zebedee Nicholls, Jan Steinhauser, Keywan Riahi
Abstract
Abstract Taking stock of global progress towards achieving the Paris Agreement requires consistently measuring aggregate national actions and pledges against modelled mitigation pathways 1 . However, national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs) and scientific assessments of anthropogenic emissions follow different accounting conventions for land-based carbon fluxes resulting in a large difference in the present emission estimates 2,3 , a gap that will evolve over time. Using state-of-the-art methodologies 4 and a land carbon-cycle emulator 5 , we align the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)-assessed mitigation pathways with the NGHGIs to make a comparison. We find that the key global mitigation benchmarks become harder to achieve when calculated using the NGHGI conventions, requiring both earlier net-zero CO 2 timing and lower cumulative emissions. Furthermore, weakening natural carbon removal processes such as carbon fertilization can mask anthropogenic land-based removal efforts, with the result that land-based carbon fluxes in NGHGIs may ultimately become sources of emissions by 2100. Our results are important for the Global Stocktake 6 , suggesting that nations will need to increase the collective ambition of their climate targets to remain consistent with the global temperature goals.