Rate-based modeling and energy optimization of acid gas removal from natural gas stream using various amine solutions

Abstract

Reduction in energy consumption of industrial plants is always an essential need due to high cost, CO 2 emissions and global warming caused by energy supply from fossil fuels for boilers and electricity consumers. Iran has been struggling to compensate the lack of gas supply for domestic and industrial demands in winter within the past decade despite of having large natural gas resources . One of the most economical methods to decrease energy requirements in hydrocarbon plants is process improvement and revamping by changing existing solvents. There are already 44 identical acid gas removal units under operation in the South Pars Gas Complex (located in Iran) with the same feed composition. The gas-sweetening unit in the Phase 12, operating with the solution of 45.5 wt% methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), was modeled by Aspen Plus for acid gas removal (CO 2 and H 2 S) as a rate-based model with the application of electrolyte non–random two–liquid (E-NRTL) activity model and Peng–Robinson equation of state in addition to the actual characteristics of the absorber and regenerator , and the operational conditions of the gas and liquid streams. After validation of the model by the real data from the plant, the incumbent amine solution was replaced with five proposed amine solutions – one single and four blended amine mixtures – in the same mass concentration to select the most efficient alternative from the aspects of outlet acid gas concentration, H 2 S content in the treated flash gas, required total power, reboiler power supply, and regeneration heat duty. The simulation results revealed that H 2 S was sharply absorbed on the top of the column, while CO 2 was smoothly removed from the gas phase to the MDEA and blended solutions along the absorber and it occurred at the bottom of the column for the DEA solution. The blended amine solution of 1.5 wt% sulfolane + 44 wt% MDEA (Sulfinol-M) has shown to be the most appropriate option instead of the solution of MDEA compared to other suggested absorbents, with several advantages such as higher selectivity of H 2 S over CO 2 , low temperature bulge, highest H 2 S loading, and outlet sweet gas flow rate while required total power, reboiler power supply, and regeneration heat duty were reduced by 21.19%, 21.26%, and 23.54% respectively. The operational conditions of the unit with the application of the Sulfinol-M solution were optimized to achieve three specifications (constraints) and the minimum required total power (objective function) through a sensitivity analysis and optimization using a genetic algorithm to assure the reliability of values for three independent parameters, namely, amine solution temperature, amine solution flow rate, and gas temperature. The optimum limits and values of these parameters were 47–50 °C, 220 – 240 ton/h, and 34 °C respectively.

Topics & Concepts