Defining response to therapy with biologics in severe asthma: from global evaluation to super response and remission
Andriana Ι. Papaioannou, Evangelia Fouka, Κonstantinos Bartziokas, Maria Kallieri, Angelos Vontetsianos, Κonstantinos Porpodis, Νikoletta Ρovina, Stelios Loukides, Petros Bakakos
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, monoclonal antibodies targeting Type-2 inflammatory pathways have been developed for severe asthma treatment. However, even when patients are carefully selected, the response to treatment varies. AREAS COVERED: Different studies have evaluated response to therapy with biologics such as exacerbation reduction, symptom improvement, pulmonary function increase, improvement in QoL, or decrease of oral corticosteroids, showing that all patients do not respond to all disease aspects and leading to an extensive debate regarding the definition of response. EXPERT OPINION: Assessing response to therapy is of great importance, but since there is no uniform definition of treatment response, the recognition of patients who really benefit from these therapies remains an unmet need. In the same context, identifying non-responding patients in which biologic therapy should be switched or substituted by alternative treatment options is of paramount importance. In this review, we present the road trip of the definition of therapeutic response to biologics in severe asthmatics by presenting the current relevant medical literature. We also present the suggested predictors of response, with an emphasis on the so-called super-responders. Finally, we discuss the recent insights regarding asthma remission as a feasible treatment goal and provide a simple algorithm for the evaluation of response.