Heat tolerance and the validity of occupational heat exposure limits in women during moderate-intensity work
Sean R. Notley, Ashley P. Akerman, Brian J. Friesen, Martin P. Poirier, Emma R. McCourt, Andreas D. Flouris, Glen P. Kenny
Abstract
To mitigate excessive rises in core temperature (>1 °C) in non-heat acclimatized workers, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) provides heat stress limits (Action Limit Values; ALV), defined by the wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and a worker’s metabolic rate. However, since these limits are based on data from men, their suitability for women remains unclear. We therefore assessed core temperature and heart rate in men ( n = 19; body surface area-to-mass ratio: 250 (SD 17) cm 2 /kg) and women ( n = 15; body surface area-to-mass ratio: 268 (SD 24) cm 2 /kg) aged 18–45 years during 180 min of walking at a moderate metabolic rate (200 W/m 2 ) in WBGTs below (16 and 24 °C) and above (28 and 32 °C) ACGIH ALV. Sex did not significantly influence (i) rises in core temperature, irrespective of WBGT, (ii) the proportion of participants with rises in core temperature >1 °C in environments below ACGIH limits, and (iii) work duration before rises in core temperature exceeded 1 °C or volitional termination in environments above ACGIH limits. Although further studies are needed, these findings indicate that for the purpose of mitigating rises in core temperature exceeding recommended limits (>1 °C), ACGIH guidelines have comparable effectiveness in non-heat acclimatized men and women during moderate-intensity work. Novelty: Sex did not appreciably influence thermal strain nor the proportion of participants with core temperatures exceeding recommended limits. Sex did not significantly influence tolerance to uncompensable heat stress. Despite originating from data obtained in only men, current occupational heat stress guidance offered comparable effectiveness in men and women.