Litcius/Paper detail

Assessment of immunoscore and MRI tumor regression grade to predict complete pathologic response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Data from phase II Averectal study.

Ali Shamseddine, Ahmad Machmouchi, Mustafa Natout, Rim Turfa, Joseph Kattan, Sally Temraz, Ayman Tawil, Mousa Elkhaldi, Omar Jaber, Rula Amarin, Tala Al Awabdeh, Maya Charafeddine, Monita Al Darazi, Hero K. Hussain

2023Journal of Clinical Oncology14 citationsDOI

Abstract

212 Background: In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate non-invasive staging tool, enabling response assessment to total neoadjuvant therapy. Wang et al had reported that 46.6% of patients with Magnetic Resonance Tumor Regression Grade 1 (mrTRG=1; complete radiologic response) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR; no residual tumor cells). We reported previously in a Phase II Averectal study the correlation between pre-treatment biopsy Immunoscore (IS) and pCR probability (68% ± 22 SD in patients with a high IS as opposed to 52% ± 22 SD in patients with a low IS; P=0.036). This study explores the value of combining IS and mrTRG to predict pCR among LARC patients. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm multicenter stage-2 phase II study investigating the efficacy and safety of 5 fractions of short course radiotherapy, followed by 6 cycles of mFOLFOX-6 plus avelumab, followed by Total Mesorectal Excision (TME), in patients with LARC. Mean density percentiles of CD3 and CD8 positive T cells infiltrating the tumor and the invasive margin in baseline tissue samples were used to calculate IS (62% is considered the cutoff between high and low IS). Baseline and post treatment MRI were reviewed by two independent radiologists to measure mrTRG and other variables. Results: Between July 2018 and October 2020, 44 patients were accrued, out of which 40 (90%) completed at least 1 cycle of mFOLFOX/Avelumab and underwent TME. Of the 40, 36 (90%) had baseline IS, mrTRG (pre-post treatment) and pTRG (pathologic Tumor Regression Grade) assessed. Out of 36, 15 (41.6%) achieved pCR, 24 (66.7%) had mrTRG=1 and 22 (61%) had high IS. Of the high IS (n=22) patients, 10 (45.45%) achieved pCR. Also, out of 24 patients with mrTRG=1, 11 (45.8%) attained pCR. Most importantly, of the patients with combined high IS and mrTRG=1 (n=14), 11 (78.6%) achieved pCR. In patients with both mrTRG=1 and high IS, pCR rate was 78.6% (11/14). This result is significantly different from pCR rate for patients with either high IS (10/22, 45.45%) or mrTRG=1 (11/24, 45.8%) with P=0.0247 and P=0.0243 respectively. Conclusions: Combining both IS and mrTRG achieved a promising predictive value for pCR in LARC and therefore upon further validation may be potentially used for patient selection in non-operative management strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT03503630 .

Topics & Concepts

MedicineColorectal cancerMagnetic resonance imagingBiopsyRadiation therapyNeoadjuvant therapyNomogramRadiologyRectumOncologyInternal medicineCancerNuclear medicineBreast cancerRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies