Litcius/Paper detail

Resection outcomes for primary and local recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma patients

Yan Yang, Shaoyou Xia, Da Teng, Shidong Hu, Songyan Li, Yufeng Wang, Xiaohui Du, Rong Li

2020Annals of Translational Medicine23 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics of primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma (PR RPLPS) and local recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma (LR RPLPS) cases were compared to determine the related factors involved in postoperative survival. METHODS: A total of 90 patients who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2013 were included in this study. Clinicopathological data that was prospectively gathered was analyzed to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The PR cases showed a higher complete resection rate when compared to the LR group. The LR group showed a greater number that were poorly differentiated and highly malignant. More blood loss was observed in the LR compared to the PR group. Multivariate analysis suggested that blood loss and tumor grade were prognostic factors for OS and PFS of the PR group, but extent of resection was a prognostic factor only for OS. In the LR group, the extent of resection was a significant prognostic factor associated with OS, whereas tumor grade was associated with PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Complete surgical resection is the most important factor for the survival of RPLPS patients. Tumor grade is an independent prognostic factor for PFS. In PR RPLPS, poor tumor classification and increased intraoperative bleeding are associated with a poor prognosis.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineLiposarcomaMultivariate analysisOverall survivalBlood lossResectionSurgerySurvival rateInternal medicineOncologySarcomaPathologySarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCardiac tumors and thrombiSurgical site infection prevention
Resection outcomes for primary and local recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma patients | Litcius