Litcius/Paper detail

Characterization of key aroma compounds in roasted chicken using SPME, SAFE, GC-O, GC–MS, AEDA, OAV, recombination-omission tests, and sensory evaluation

Ruotong Nie, Chunjiang Zhang, Huan Liu, Xiangru Wei, Rong‐Mei Gao, Haonan Shi, Dequan Zhang, Zhenyu Wang

2024Food Chemistry X40 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Aroma compounds in the roasted breasts, thighs and skins of chicken were isolated by solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE), quantitated by gas chromatography–olfactometry-mass (GC-O-MS), analyzed by aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA), and determined by recombination-omission tests and sensory evaluation. Forty-seven aroma compounds in total, including aldehydes, ketones, furans, pyrazines, and furanones, were selected by AEDA. Twenty-five compounds were selected as pivotal odorants (Odor Activity Value, OAV ≥ 1). Twenty aroma compounds significantly were identified by recombination and omission experiments. Anethole (fennel odor) was the highest OAV (> 1843). Hexanal (grassy) and (E, E)-2,4-decadienal (meaty) were the most abundant aldehydes identified in roasted chicken. 1-octen-3-ol (mushroom), methanethiol (cabbage) and dimethyl trisulfide (areca, sulfur) were considered the key compounds of the breast and thighs of roasted chicken. Notably, furanone and pyrazines, 4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3(2H)-furanone (caramel, sweet and burning odor), 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine (nutty, toasty) and 2,3-dimethyl-5-ethylpyrazine (nutty, toasty) had the most significant effect on roasted chicken odor, especially in the skin.

Topics & Concepts

AromaGas chromatography–mass spectrometryChromatographyChemistryKey (lock)Food scienceMass spectrometryComputer scienceComputer securityMeat and Animal Product QualityAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Characterization of key aroma compounds in roasted chicken using SPME, SAFE, GC-O, GC–MS, AEDA, OAV, recombination-omission tests, and sensory evaluation | Litcius