Litcius/Paper detail

Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation as First-Line Treatment for Typical Atrial Flutter

Dhiraj Gupta, Wern Yew Ding, Peter Calvert, Emmanuel Ato Williams, Moloy Das, Lilith Tovmassian, Muzahir H. Tayebjee, Guy A. Haywood, Claire Martin, Kim Rajappan, Matthew Bates, Ian P. Temple, Tobias Reichlin, Zhong Chen, Richard Balasubramaniam, Christina Ronayne, Nichola Clarkson, Maureen Morgan, Janet Barton, Ian Kemp, Saagar Mahida, Christian Sticherling

2022Heart20 citationsDOI

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with standard radiofrequency cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation as first-line treatment for typical atrial flutter (AFL). METHODS: Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation as First-Line Treatment for Typical Atrial Flutter was an international, multicentre, open with blinded assessment trial. Patients with CTI-dependent AFL and no documented atrial fibrillation (AF) were randomised to either cryoballoon PVI alone or radiofrequency CTI ablation. Primary efficacy outcome was time to first recurrence of sustained (>30 s) symptomatic atrial arrhythmia (AF/AFL/atrial tachycardia) at 12 months as assessed by continuous monitoring with an implantable loop recorder. Primary safety outcome was a composite of death, stroke, tamponade requiring drainage, atrio-oesophageal fistula, pacemaker implantation, serious vascular complications or persistent phrenic nerve palsy. RESULTS: Trial recruitment was halted at 113 of the target 130 patients because of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (PVI, n=59; CTI ablation, n=54). Median age was 66 (IQR 61-71) years, with 98 (86.7%) men. At 12 months, the primary outcome occurred in 11 (18.6%) patients in the PVI group and 9 (16.7%) patients in the CTI group. There was no significant difference in the primary efficacy outcome between the groups (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.67). AFL recurred in six (10.2%) patients in the PVI arm and one (1.9%) patient in the CTI arm (p=0.116). Time to occurrence of AF of ≥2 min was significantly reduced with cryoballoon PVI (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.85). The composite safety outcome occurred in four patients in the PVI arm and three patients in the CTI arm (p=1.000). CONCLUSION: Cryoballoon PVI as first-line treatment for AFL is equally effective compared with standard CTI ablation for preventing recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and better at preventing new-onset AF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03401099.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineAtrial fibrillationPulmonary veinRadiofrequency ablationAtrial tachycardiaCardiologyAtrial flutterInternal medicineInterquartile rangeAblationSurgeryCatheter ablationAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies