The first 1000 days: A critical period of nutritional opportunity and vulnerability
Jane Scott
Abstract
The period of life between conception and a child's second birthday, referred to popularly as the first 1000 days, is key to lifelong health and wellbeing.1 It is a period of rapid growth and neurodevelopment, high nutritional requirements and high sensitivity to programming effects and, as a consequence, is a time of great vulnerability.2 Failure to provide sufficient kilojoules and key nutrients during this critical period may result in stunting and lifelong deficits in brain function. In addition, child and adult health risks, including obesity, cardiovascular, metabolic and endocrine disease, may be programmed as a result of exposure to an adverse nutritional environment during this period.3 Although the most active period of neurological development occurs in the first 1000 days, parenting and early education in the preschool years also have an impact on long-term developmental and health outcomes.4 From a dietary perspective, early childhood is a period of life when food preferences and eating behaviours, which are influenced by parental feeding practices and role modelling, are firmly established. Food preferences and eating behaviours have been shown to track into later life5 and provide the foundation for either good or poor health in later childhood and adulthood.6 This issue of Nutrition & Dietetics includes a collection of original nutrition research that spans these critical first 1000 days of life and beyond. In addition to papers related to pregnancy,7-10 infancy11-13 and the preschool years,14 there are papers related to schoolchildren,15 adolescents16 and young adults.17, 18 Folate and iodine both play crucial roles in foetal neurodevelopment7 but are often lacking in the diets of pregnant women. Consequently, routine supplementation in pregnancy of both of these nutrients is recommended.19 However, adherence to these supplementation recommendations by pregnant women in Australia is far from universal,20 and therefore, many pregnant women rely, at least in part, on dietary intake to meet their increased needs for these nutrients. In Australia, mandatory fortification of breads with iodine and folate was introduced in 2009 in an effort to increase population dietary intake of these nutrients.21 Sherriff et al investigated the dietary iodine intake of pregnant women attending antenatal classes in Perth and found that only three of five women consumed bread daily.8 Similarly, James-McAlpine et al assessed the diets of a cohort of pregnant South East Queensland women and found that the daily serves of grain-based food were less than half the recommended intake.22 The implication of both these studies is that the dietary intake of both folate and iodine by pregnant Australian women is likely to be insufficient As well as being an important period for foetal development, pregnancy is considered an opportune time for promoting healthy nutrition practices to women when they are purportedly more motivated to care for their own health and that of their offspring. The internet has become the most popular source of nutrition information used by Australian adults in general.23 While, traditionally, health professionals have been, and remain, the primary source of nutrition information for Australian pregnant women, in this issue, Lobo et al report that Australian pregnant women are increasingly searching the internet for information on a variety of nutrition topics relevant to pregnancy.9 It is critical, therefore, that pregnant women have access to relevant and factual information from credible online sources. Lobo et al rated the accuracy of 136 websites and found that government and business/company websites had an encouragingly high degree of accuracy, whereas the websites of community groups had a lower degree of accuracy, and personal blogs were a source of largely inaccurate information.9 Given the importance of iodine in pregnancy, surprisingly few women (11.8%) searched the internet for information on this nutrient. Of greater concern is the finding that just under half of the women surveyed in 2018 were unsure if they had received information on iodine, suggesting that iodine supplementation recommendations are not being effectively communicated to this target audience, let alone adhered to. Not only does breastfeeding provide optimal nutrition to infants, it is also beneficially associated with a range of short- and long-term health outcomes.24 Parizkova et al investigated the association between breastfeeding duration and infant disease in a cross-sectional study of 2304 Czech mothers.11 Their findings are generally consistent with the current literature,24 including that children fully breastfed to 6 months of age had a significantly lower risk of having been prescribed antibiotics for an upper respiratory tract infection than infants who were partially breastfed or formula fed at 6 months. This is consistent with the evidence that breastfeeding reduces the severity of respiratory illnesses in infants.25 This finding is also of importance given the disruptive effect that antibiotics have on the developing infant's gut microbiota, which may have long-term metabolic consequences.26 The consequences of poor nutrition in the first 1000 days are felt particularly in vulnerable populations. Leonard et al have previously highlighted an alarming rate of anaemia amongst pregnant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in Far North Queensland.27 Iron deficiency anaemia in early childhood is common worldwide and can have a detrimental effect on growth and neurodevelopment. Young children are particularly vulnerable because of their rapidly developing brain, and iron deficiency in early childhood can have lifelong consequences.28 In this issue, Leonard et al14 report on the association of early childhood anaemia and developmental outcomes at school age among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children of remote Far North Queensland. They show, in this study, that children who experienced anaemia between 6 and 24 months of age had double the risk of adverse developmental outcomes at school age. Several papers in this issue provide further evidence of the importance of adequate and timely nutrition in the first 1000 days and the need for this to be communicated effectively to new mothers and mothers to be. While pregnancy is seen as a critical window of opportunity for promoting healthy eating to women, food choices of pregnant women appear to be driven primarily by sensory and not health motives,22 as is the case in the general population. In particular, the iodine intake of pregnant women continues to be of concern, with dietary intakes likely to be insufficient, and the importance of iodine in pregnancy is seemingly ineffectively communicated to this target group. There is a need for nutritionists and dietitians, along with other health professionals, to continually advocate for public policies and deliver programs that ensure the provision of optimal nutrition and promotion of healthy eating during this critical period. The author has no conflict of interest to declare.