Litcius/Paper detail

Residual clinical damage after COVID-19: A retrospective and prospective observational cohort study

Rebecca De Lorenzo, Caterina Conte, Chiara Lanzani, Francesco Benedetti, Luisa Roveri, Mario Gennaro Mazza, Elena Brioni, Giacomo Giacalone, Valentina Canti, Valentina Sofia, Marta D’Amico, Davide Di Napoli, Alberto Ambrosio, Paolo Scarpellini, Antonella Castagna, Giovanni Landoni, Alberto Zangrillo, Emanuele Bosi, Moreno Tresoldi, Fabio Ciceri, Patrizia Rovere‐Querini

2020PLoS ONE183 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Data on residual clinical damage after Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) are lacking. The aims of this study were to investigate whether COVID-19 leaves behind residual dysfunction, and identify patients who might benefit from post-discharge monitoring. All patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) for COVID-19, and evaluated at post-discharge follow-up between 7 April and 7 May, 2020, were enrolled. Primary outcome was need of follow-up, defined as the presence at follow-up of at least one among: respiratory rate (RR) >20 breaths/min, uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) requiring therapeutic change, moderate to very severe dyspnoea, malnutrition, or new-onset cognitive impairment, according to validated scores. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) served as secondary outcome. 185 patients were included. Median [interquartile range] time from hospital discharge to follow-up was 23 [20-29] days. 109 (58.9%) patients needed follow-up. At follow-up evaluation, 58 (31.3%) patients were dyspnoeic, 41 (22.2%) tachypnoeic, 10 (5.4%) malnourished, 106 (57.3%) at risk for malnutrition. Forty (21.6%) patients had uncontrolled BP requiring therapeutic change, and 47 (25.4%) new-onset cognitive impairment. PTSD was observed in 41 (22.2%) patients. At regression tree analysis, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) and body mass index (BMI) at ED presentation, and age emerged as independent predictors of the need of follow-up. Patients with PaO2/FiO2 <324 and BMI ≥33 Kg/m2 had the highest odds to require follow-up. Among hospitalised patients, age ≥63 years, or age <63 plus non-invasive ventilation or diabetes identified those with the highest probability to need follow-up. PTSD was independently predicted by female gender and hospitalisation, the latter being protective (odds ratio, OR, 4.03, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.76 to 9.47, p 0.0011; OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.92, p 0.033, respectively). COVID-19 leaves behind physical and psychological dysfunctions. Follow-up programmes should be implemented for selected patients.

Topics & Concepts

Retrospective cohort studyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineObservational study2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Prospective cohort studyCohort studyInternal medicineVirologyDiseaseOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Residual clinical damage after COVID-19: A retrospective and prospective observational cohort study | Litcius