Litcius/Paper detail

Rapid Reconstruction of Four-dimensional MR Angiography of the Thoracic Aorta Using a Convolutional Neural Network

Hassan Haji‐Valizadeh, Daming Shen, Ryan Avery, Ali Serhal, Florian Schiffers, Aggelos K. Katsaggelos, Oliver Cossairt, Daniel Kim

2020Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging16 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Purpose To implement an integrated reconstruction pipeline including a graphics processing unit (GPU)–based convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture and test whether it reconstructs four-dimensional non-Cartesian, non–contrast material–enhanced MR angiographic k-space data faster than a central processing unit (CPU)–based compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction pipeline, without significant losses in data fidelity, summed visual score (SVS), or arterial vessel–diameter measurements. Materials and Methods Raw k-space data of 24 patients (18 men and six women; mean age, 56.8 years ± 11.8 [standard deviation]) suspected of having thoracic aortic disease were used to evaluate the proposed reconstruction pipeline derived from an open-source three-dimensional CNN. For training, 4800 zero-filled images and the corresponding CS-reconstructed images from 10 patients were used as input-output pairs. For testing, 6720 zero-filled images from 14 different patients were used as inputs to a trained CNN. Metrics for evaluating the agreement between the CNN and CS images included reconstruction times, structural similarity index (SSIM) and normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE), SVS (3 = nondiagnostic, 9 = clinically acceptable, 15 = excellent), and vessel diameters. Results The mean reconstruction time was 65 times and 69 times shorter for the CPU-based and GPU-based CNN pipelines (216.6 seconds ± 40.5 and 204.9 seconds ± 40.5), respectively, than for CS (14 152.3 seconds ± 1708.6) (P < .001). Compared with CS as practical ground truth, CNNs produced high data fidelity (SSIM = 0.94 ± 0.02, NRMSE = 2.8% ± 0.4) and not significantly different (P = .25) SVS and aortic diameters, except at one out of seven locations, where the percentage difference was only 3% (ie, clinically irrelevant). Conclusion The proposed integrated reconstruction pipeline including a CNN architecture is capable of rapidly reconstructing time-resolved volumetric cardiovascular MRI k-space data, without a significant loss in data quality, thereby supporting clinical translation of said non–contrast-enhanced MR angiograms. Supplemental material is available for this article. Keywords: Adults, Angiography, MR-Angiography, Vascular © RSNA, 2020

Topics & Concepts

Convolutional neural networkThoracic aortaMedicineAngiographyRadiologyText miningComputer scienceAortaArtificial intelligenceNatural language processingInternal medicineAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases