Respiratory Support in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema: Clinical Insights from Cardiology and Intensive Care
Nardi Tetaj, Giulia Capecchi, Dorotea Rubino, Giulia Valeria Stazi, E Cingolani, Antonio Lesci, Andrea Segreti, Francesco Grigioni, Maria Grazia Bocci
Abstract
Cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) is a life-threatening manifestation of acute heart failure characterized by rapid accumulation of fluid in the interstitial and alveolar spaces, leading to severe dyspnea, hypoxemia, and respiratory failure. The condition arises from elevated left-sided filling pressures that increase pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure, disrupt alveolo-capillary barrier integrity, and impair gas exchange. Neurohormonal activation further perpetuates congestion and increases myocardial workload, creating a vicious cycle of hemodynamic overload and respiratory compromise. Respiratory support is a cornerstone of management in CPE, aimed at stabilizing oxygenation, reducing the work of breathing, and facilitating ventricular unloading while definitive therapies, such as diuretics, vasodilators, inotropes, or mechanical circulatory support (MCS), address the underlying cause. Among available modalities, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) has the strongest evidence base in moderate-to-severe CPE, consistently reducing the need for intubation and providing rapid relief of dyspnea. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) represents an emerging alternative in patients with moderate hypoxemia or intolerance to mask ventilation, and should be considered an adjunctive option in selected patients with less severe disease or NIV intolerance, although its efficacy in severe presentations remains uncertain. Invasive mechanical ventilation is reserved for refractory cases, while extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and other advanced circulatory support modalities may be necessary in cardiogenic shock. Integration of respiratory strategies with hemodynamic optimization is essential, as positive pressure ventilation favorably modulates preload and afterload, synergizing with pharmacological unloading. Future directions include personalization of ventilatory strategies using advanced monitoring, novel interfaces to improve tolerability, and earlier integration of MCS. In summary, respiratory support in CPE is both a bridge and a decisive therapeutic intervention, interrupting the cycle of hypoxemia and hemodynamic deterioration. A multidisciplinary, individualized approach remains central to improving outcomes in this high-risk population.