Litcius/Paper detail

A six-step process to explore facial expressions performances to detect pain in dairy cows with lipopolysaccharide-induced clinical mastitis

Laure Ginger, Lydiane Aubé, Dorothée Ledoux, Marie-Caroline Borot, C. David, Matthieu Bouchon, Matthew C. Leach, D. Durand, Alice de Boyer Des Roches

2023Applied Animal Behaviour Science11 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the performances of Facial Action Units (FAUs) to detect pain in cows under lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge though a six-step process based on expression, selectivity (construct validity, responsiveness), intra- and inter-observer reliability, and measurement error (specificity, Sp; sensitivity, Se). Twenty-seven cows received an intra-mammary infusion of 25 µg E. coli LPS in one healthy udder quarter. Then, 14 cows received a placebo (LPS cows) and 13 cows received 3 mg/kg BW ketoprofen i.m. (LPS+NSAID cows). Each cow’s face was video-recorded for 40 s at three time points before (T-21 = 11:30 h, T-19 = 13:30 h, T-16 = 16:30 h) and after (T3 = 11:30 h, T5 = 13:30 h, T8 = 16:30 h) infusion. Three trained observers scored the duration, frequency or presence/absence of 43 FAUs on 40 second video segments. We kept only the selective FAUs (construct validity) and transformed them into binary variables (below / above a threshold determined by ROC curves and Youden index). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were assessed by percentage of agreement (PA) and Fleiss’ kappa (k). We calculated Sp and Se. The process therefore consisted in a waterfall method with expression, selectivity, intra-observer reliability being an eliminative step, while inter-observer reliability, Sp and Se were not. FAUs were kept if expressed (>5% of the videos), and kept for intra-observer reliability if PA≥ 75% and k ≥ 0.41. Two too rarely expressed FAUs were excluded. LPS infusion induced changes in 7 FAUs of orbital, auricular, and mouth-and-muzzle regions. Compared to before challenge (T-19), at T5, LPS cows spent significantly less time with ‘muzzle in motion’ (P = 0.045), tended to display more ‘nostril dilation’ (P = 0.097), spend more time with ‘motionless muzzle’ (P = 0.068) and less time in ‘ear: position 8′ (i.e. backwards /central/pinna to the side) (P = 0.057). At T8, LPS cows spent significantly less time with ‘eye open’ (P = 0.036) and tended to less frequently display ‘eye blinking’ (P = 0.071) and ‘eye movements’ (P = 0.091) compared to T-16. Four of these 7 FAUs (‘eye open’, ‘motionless muzzle’, ‘muzzle in motion’, ‘nostril dilatation’) satisfied all following steps of the process except sensitivity. Two other FAUs (‘eye blinking’, ‘eye movements’) satisfied intra- and inter-observer reliability; depending on the time point considered they were either sensitive or specific but not both simultaneously. The last FAU (‘ear: position 8′) satisfied intra-observer reliability and sensitivity but not inter-observer reliability nor specificity. This study identified 7 FAUs as potential candidate for detecting mild pain associated with induced inflammatory mastitis in dairy cows.

Topics & Concepts

UdderMedicineAnimal scienceValidityPlaceboRepeatabilityConstruct validityMathematicsInternal medicineMastitisSurgeryStatisticsBiologyPsychometricsPatient satisfactionPathologyAlternative medicineAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaHuman-Animal Interaction Studies