Worse Interference of Fe <sup>3+</sup> than Fe <sup>2+</sup> on Degrading the Interphase and Performance of LiFePO <sub>4</sub> ||Graphite Battery
Jiayi Zhang, Suting Weng, Cong Zhong, Jiacheng Zhu, Yan Liu, Qiu Fang, Hao Zhang, Yejing Li, Xuefeng Wang
Abstract
Abstract The detrimental effects of Fe‐ion crosstalk on LiFePO 4 ||Graphite battery performance, coupled with limited mechanistic insights into solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) evolution under such interference, warrant systematic investigation. Herein, advanced characterization techniques—including X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy—are employed to reveal SEI evolution on graphite anodes under Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ influence. Results demonstrate that Fe 3+ exerts more severe adverse effects than Fe 2+ . Specifically, Fe 2+ primarily promotes conventional electrolyte reduction reactions, increasing H 2 , CH 4 , and CO 2 generation. In contrast, Fe 3+ facilitates radical combinations and catalyzes two‐electron reductions, triggering side reactions releasing CO, C 2 H 4 , and C 2 H 6 . The SEI thickness under Fe‐ion interference (Fe 2+ : 7.20–13.76 nm, Fe 3+ : 9.12–17.55 nm) significantly exceeds that of the base electrolyte (3.15–7.64 nm), with Fe deposits accumulating in organometallic forms. Critically, the presence of Fe 3+ and its adverse impacts on battery safety and cycling stability are validated in practical pouch cells. This study uncovers the chemical nature of the dissolved Fe ion and its deposits, provides mechanistic insights into its interference with SEI properties and Li‐ion battery performances, which in turn helps to mitigate such detrimental effects.