Litcius/Paper detail

Energy Funneling in Quasi‐2D Ruddlesden–Popper Perovskites: Charge Transfer versus Resonant Energy Transfer

Zhixing Gan, Weijian Chen, Cihui Liu, Jinlei Zhang, Yunsong Di, Liyan Yu, Lifeng Dong, Baohua Jia, Xiaoming Wen

2021Advanced Photonics Research20 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The quasi‐2D Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites contain a collection of grains with inhomogeneous bandgaps, enabling efficient energy funneling from high‐bandgap grains (donors) to low‐bandgap grains (acceptors), leading to localization of carriers and suppression of defect trapping. However, the exact mechanism for the energy funneling is still fiercely debated. Charge transfer (CT) via carrier diffusion and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) based on dipole interactions are the two conceivable models. Herein, by controlling the degree of energy funneling, both carrier dynamics of donors and acceptors are investigated. Transient absorption (TA) results suggest that the energy funneling mainly occurs at a timescale longer than the FRET mechanism. Moreover, the degree of energy funneling is revealed and the carrier diffusion lengths display a similar dependence on temperature, evidencing the interdomain energy funneling is dominated by CT. This work provides a significant insight into energy funneling mechanism that is important for future developments of optoelectronic devices.

Topics & Concepts

Förster resonance energy transferCharge carrierBand gapDiffusionDipoleMaterials scienceTrappingCondensed matter physicsAbsorption (acoustics)Chemical physicsEnergy transferEnergy (signal processing)SemiconductorCharge (physics)Work (physics)Molecular physicsOptoelectronicsAtomic physicsPhysicsFluorescenceOpticsBiologyQuantum mechanicsThermodynamicsEcologyPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesConducting polymers and applications
Energy Funneling in Quasi‐2D Ruddlesden–Popper Perovskites: Charge Transfer versus Resonant Energy Transfer | Litcius