Litcius/Paper detail

Charting the Metal-Dependent High-Pressure Stability of Bimetallic UiO-66 Materials

Sven M. J. Rogge, Pascal G. Yot, Jannick Jacobsen, Francesco Muniz‐Miranda, Steven Vandenbrande, Jonas Gosch, Vanessa Ortiz, Ines E. Collings, Sabine Devautour‐Vinot, Guillaume Maurin, Norbert Stock, Véronique Van Speybroeck

2020ACS Materials Letters55 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

In theory, bimetallic UiO-66(Zr:Ce) and UiO-66(Zr:Hf) metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are extremely versatile and attractive nanoporous materials as they combine the high catalytic activity of UiO-66(Ce) or UiO-66(Hf) with the outstanding stability of UiO-66(Zr). Using in situ high-pressure powder X-ray diffraction, however, we observe that this expected mechanical stability is not achieved when incorporating cerium or hafnium in UiO-66(Zr). This observation is akin to the earlier observed reduced thermal stability of UiO-66(Zr:Ce) compounds. To elucidate the atomic origin of this phenomenon, we chart the loss-of-crystallinity pressures of 22 monometallic and bimetallic UiO-66 materials and systematically isolate their intrinsic mechanical stability from their defect-induced weakening. This complementary experimental/computational approach reveals that the intrinsic mechanical stability of these bimetallic MOFs decreases nonlinearly upon cerium incorporation but remains unaffected by the zirconium: hafnium ratio. Additionally, all experimental samples suffer from defect-induced weakening, a synthesis-controlled effect that is observed to be independent of their intrinsic stability.

Topics & Concepts

Bimetallic stripMaterials scienceHafniumZirconiumCrystallinityCeriumThermal stabilityNanoporousMetal-organic frameworkMetalChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyComposite materialPhysical chemistryChemistryMetallurgyAdsorptionEngineeringMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsBoron and Carbon Nanomaterials ResearchX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography