Litcius/Paper detail

Decision Making for Treatment After ACL Injury From an Orthopaedic Surgeon and Patient Perspective: Results From the NACOX Study

Hanna Tigerstrand Grevnerts, Sofi Sonesson, Håkan Gauffin, Clare L. Ardern, Anders Stålman, Joanna Kvist

2021Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine36 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, there is little evidence of when and why a decision for ACL reconstruction (ACLR) or nonoperative treatment (non-ACLR) is made. PURPOSE: To (1) describe the key characteristics of ACL injury treatment decisions and (2) compare patient-reported knee instability, function, and preinjury activity level between patients with non-ACLR and ACLR treatment decisions. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 216 patients with acute ACL injury were evaluated during the first year after injury. The treatment decision was non-ACLR in 73 patients and ACLR in 143. Reasons guiding treatment decision were obtained from medical charts and questionnaires to patients and orthopaedic surgeons. Patient-reported instability and function were obtained via questionnaires and compared between patients with non-ACLR and ACLR treatment decisions. The ACLR treatment group was classified retrospectively by decision phase: acute phase (decision made between injury day and 31 days after injury), subacute phase (decision made between 32 days and up to 5 months after injury), and late phase (decision made 5-12 months after injury). Data were evaluated using descriptive statistics, and group comparisons were made using parametric or nonparametric tests as appropriate. RESULTS: = .006) ACLR decision groups. There were no differences in patient-reported instability and function between treatment decision groups at baseline, 4 weeks after injury, or 3 months after injury. CONCLUSION: Activity demands, not patient-reported knee instability, may be the most important factor in the decision-making process for treatment after ACL injury. We suggest a decision-making algorithm for patients with ACL injuries and no high activity demands; waiting for >3 months can help distinguish those who need surgical intervention from those who can undergo nonoperative management. REGISTRATION: NCT02931084 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Topics & Concepts

MedicineACL injuryPerspective (graphical)Orthopedic surgeryPhysical therapyAnterior cruciate ligamentSurgeryGeneral surgeryArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesBone fractures and treatments
Decision Making for Treatment After ACL Injury From an Orthopaedic Surgeon and Patient Perspective: Results From the NACOX Study | Litcius