Litcius/Paper detail

A Guide to Benchmarking <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 Performance Data

Bert George, Bram Verschuere, Ellen Wayenberg, Bishoy L. Zaki

2020Public Administration Review59 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

If the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us anything, it is that policy makers, experts, and public managers need to be capable of interpreting comparative data on their government's performance in a meaningful way. Simultaneously, they are confronted with different data sources (and measurements) on COVID-19 without necessarily having the tools to assess these sources strategically. Because of the speed with which decisions are required and the different data sources, it can be challenging for any policy maker, expert, or public manager to make sense of how COVID-19 has an impact, especially from a comparative perspective. Starting from the question "How can we benchmark COVID-19 performance data across countries?," this article presents important indicators, measurements, and their strengths and weaknesses, and concludes with practical recommendations. These include a focus on measurement equivalence, systems thinking, spatial and temporal thinking, multilevel governance, and multimethod designs.

Topics & Concepts

BenchmarkingCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Strengths and weaknessesBenchmark (surveying)Equivalence (formal languages)Corporate governancePerspective (graphical)Computer scienceGovernment (linguistics)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Data sciencePublic relationsBusinessPolitical sciencePsychologyMarketingArtificial intelligenceInfectious disease (medical specialty)MedicineGeographySocial psychologyOutbreakFinanceDiseasePhilosophyLinguisticsGeodesyVirologyPathologyCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesHealthcare Systems and ReformsSpatial and Panel Data Analysis