Litcius/Paper detail

Is tokenization needed for masked particle modeling?

Matthew Leigh, S. B. Klein, François Charton, T. Golling, L. Heinrich, M. Kagan, I. Ochoa, Margarita Osadchy

2025Machine Learning Science and Technology6 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we significantly enhance masked particle modeling (MPM), a self-supervised learning scheme for constructing highly expressive representations of unordered sets relevant to developing foundation models for high-energy physics. In MPM, a model is trained to recover the missing elements of a set, a learning objective that requires no labels and can be applied directly to experimental data. We achieve significant performance improvements over previous work on MPM by addressing inefficiencies in the implementation and incorporating a more powerful decoder. We compare several pre-training tasks and introduce new reconstruction methods that utilize conditional generative models without data tokenization or discretization. We show that these new methods outperform the tokenized learning objective from the original MPM on a new test bed for foundation models for jets, which includes using a wide variety of downstream tasks relevant to jet physics, such as classification, secondary vertex finding, and track identification.

Topics & Concepts

Lexical analysisComputer scienceParticle (ecology)Natural language processingBiologyEcologyParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesComputational Physics and Python ApplicationsNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Is tokenization needed for masked particle modeling? | Litcius