Resistance to aztreonam-avibactam among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli is primarily mediated by altered penicillin-binding protein 3 and impermeability
Chaitanya Tellapragada, Mohammad Razavi, Pol Saludes Peris, Patrik Jonsson, Martin Vondracek, Christian G. Giske
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate decreased susceptibility (minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs] 0.25-4 mg/L) and resistance (MICs > 4 mg/L) to aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI). Contemporary non-replicate clinical isolates of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli (CP-EC) (n=90) and ESBL-producing E. coli (EP-EC) (n=12) were used. CP-EC belonged to 25 distinct sequence types (STs) and all EP-EC belonged to ST405. All strains were isolated from 2019 to 2022 at the Karolinska University Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden. ATM-AVI MICs were determined using broth microdilution. The EUCAST epidemiological cut-off value of 0.125 mg/L was used to define the wild type (WT). Whole-genome sequences (Illumina) were analysed for detecting resistance determinants among WT vs. non-WT isolates. Among 102 isolates, 40 (39%) and 62 (61%) were WT and non-WT, respectively. Among non-WT isolates, resistance was noted for 20 and decreased susceptibility for 42. Resistance was observed among 14/47 New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producers, 5/43 OXA-48 group producers, and 1/12 EP-EC. Decreased susceptibility was observed among 29/47 NDM, 13/43 OXA-48 group, and 3/12 EP-EC. Resistant isolates predominantly belonged to ST405, followed by STs 410, 361, 167, 617, and 1284. Penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3) inserts (YRIK/YRIN) were observed in 20/20 and CMY-42 in 5/20 resistant isolates. Several mutations in the ftsI (encoding PBP3) and regulatory genes of outer membrane proteins (OmpC and OmpF) and efflux pumps (AcrAB-TolC) were detected. A ≥ 2-fold reduction in MICs was observed among 20/20 vs. 7/20 isolates tested in the presence of the membrane permeabiliser, polymyxin B nanopeptide (PMBN) and efflux inhibitor, phenylalanine arginine β-naphthylamide (PAβN), respectively. In conclusion, resistance to ATM-AVI is a result of interplay of various determinants, including target alterations, deactivating enzymes, and decreased permeability.