Comparison of Slate Safety Wearable Device to Ingestible Pill and Wearable Heart Rate Monitor
Michael Callihan, Heather S. Cole, Holly Stokley, Joshua Gunter, Kaitlyn Clamp, Alexis Martin, Hannah Doherty
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the increase in concern for deaths and illness related to the increase in temperature globally, there is a growing need for real-time monitoring of workers for heat stress indicators. The purpose of this study was to determine the usability of the Slate Safety (SS) wearable physiological monitoring system. METHODS: Twenty nurses performed a common task in a moderate or hot environment while wearing the SS device, the Polar 10 monitor, and having taken the e-Celsius ingestible pill. Data from each device was compared for correlation and accuracy. RESULTS: High correlation was determined between the SS wearable device and the Polar 10 system (0.926) and the ingestible pill (0.595). The SS was comfortable to wear and easily monitored multiple participants from a distance. CONCLUSIONS: The Slate Safety wearable device demonstrated accuracy in measuring core temperature and heart rate while not restricting the motion of the worker, and provided a remote monitoring platform for physiological parameters.